ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 15–18, 2026
Phoenix, AZ|Arizona Grand Resort & Spa
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2026
Nuclear Technology
September 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2026
Latest News
What’s reshaping nuclear licensing and compliance today?
Mark Reidmeyer
It is the convergence of urgency, innovation, and modernization that is reshaping nuclear licensing and compliance today.
For decades, nuclear licensing operated in a relatively stable environment built around large light water reactors, predictable review cycles, and well-established regulatory pathways. Today, that model is evolving rapidly. Advanced reactors, AI-enabled tools, digital engineering platforms, grid reliability concerns, and aggressive decarbonization goals are all pushing the industry—and regulators—to move faster and think differently.
C. Z. Serpan, Jr.
Nuclear Technology | Volume 12 | Number 1 | September 1971 | Pages 108-118
Technical Paper | Material | doi.org/10.13182/NT71-A15903
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A simulated vessel wall environment was constructed that provided for measurements of steel embrittlement increase and neutron flux detector activation at two typical surveillance program locations, as well as at five additional locations, through the thickness of an 8-in.-thick steel “vessel wall.” Neutron spectra for these locations were calculated using one transport and two diffusion theory reactor physics spectrum codes plus a multiple-foil spectrum analysis code. The measured increases in steel transition temperature from the experimental locations revealed the expected gradient of highest embrittlement near the core to least embrittlement at the outer edge of the simulated vessel. Good agreement with published trends was observed. Comparisons of the code calculations versus measurements of the decrease in fluence level between locations, however, were favorable only over the shortest distances. Neutron fluences for the critically important region between fuel core and pressure vessel inner edge were significantly higher from a multiple-foil spectrum analysis code than from transport and diffusion codes when based on comparisons of spectrally adjusted iron activation measurements. This evidence of the possibility that the real fluence values in the pressure vessel wall environment are higher than those produced by common measurement techniques suggests the need for reevaluation of current surveillance data, improvements in reactor physics codes, and continuing assessments of measured versus calculated surveillance fluence data.