ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Jan 2026
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
February 2026
Nuclear Technology
January 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
November 2025
Latest News
Jeff Place on INPO’s strategy for industry growth
As executive vice president for industry strategy at the Institute of Nuclear Power Operations, Jeff Place leads INPO’s industry-facing work, engaging directly with chief nuclear officers.
James P. Adams, Corwin L. Atwood
Nuclear Technology | Volume 94 | Number 3 | June 1991 | Pages 361-371
Technical Paper | Nuclear Fuel Cycle | doi.org/10.13182/NT91-A15814
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) requires utilities to determine the response of a pressurized water reactor (PWR) to a steam generator tube rupture (SGTR) as part of the safety analysis for the plant. The SGTR analysis includes assumptions regarding the presence of fission product iodine in the reactor coolant resulting from iodine spikes. To get a better understanding of iodine spiking, reactor trip and associated radiochemistry data were collected from 26 PWRs. These data were compared against validation criteria to determine their applicability to an investigation of the magnitude of an iodine spike following a reactor trip. The applicable data and the results of a statistical analysis are presented. Conclusions are made from this analysis of iodine spiking following reactor trips concerning the magnitude of a spike during an SGTR and compared with the NRC analysis criteria. The conclusion is then made that the iodine release rate expected during an SGTR, on the basis of the analysis of the data base, is much less (by a factor of 15 or more) than that specified by the NRC for analysis of this accident type.