ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Dec 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
January 2026
Nuclear Technology
December 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
November 2025
Latest News
What’s the most difficult question you’ve been asked as a maintenance instructor?
Blye Widmar
"Where are the prints?!"
This was the final question in an onslaught of verbal feedback, comments, and critiques I received from my students back in 2019. I had two years of instructor experience and was teaching a class that had been meticulously rehearsed in preparation for an accreditation visit. I knew the training material well and transferred that knowledge effectively enough for all the students to pass the class. As we wrapped up, I asked the students how they felt about my first big system-level class, and they did not hold back.
“Why was the exam from memory when we don’t work from memory in the plant?” “Why didn’t we refer to the vendor documents?” “Why didn’t we practice more on the mock-up?” And so on.
Raymond K. Maynard, Tushar K. Ghosh, Robert V. Tompson, Dabir S. Viswanath, Sudarshan K. Loyalka
Nuclear Technology | Volume 172 | Number 1 | October 2010 | Pages 88-100
Technical Paper | Materials for Nuclear Systems | doi.org/10.13182/NT10-6
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
An experimental system was constructed in accordance with the standard ASTM C835-06 to measure the total hemispherical emittance (emissivity) of structural materials of interest in very high temperature reactor (VHTR) systems. First, data were acquired for 304 stainless steel as well as for oxidized and unoxidized nickel, and good reproducibility and agreement with the literature was found. Emissivity of Hastelloy X was then measured under different conditions that included (a) "as received" (original sample) from the supplier, (b) with increased surface roughness, (c) oxidized, and (d) graphite coated. Measurements were made over a wide range of temperatures. Hastelloy X, as received from the supplier, was cleaned before additional roughening of the surface and coating with graphite. The emissivity of the original samples (cleaned after received) varied from [approximately]0.18 to 0.28 in the temperature range of 473 to 1498 K. The apparent emissivity increased only slightly as the roughness of the surface increased (without corrections for the increased surface area due to the increased surface roughness). When Hastelloy X was coated with graphite or was oxidized, however, its emissivity was observed to increase substantially. With a deposited graphite layer on the Hastelloy, increases from 0.2 to 0.53 at 473 K and from 0.25 to 0.6 at 1473 K were observed - a finding that has strong favorable safety implications in terms of decay heat removal in postaccident VHTR environments. Initial oxidation of Hastelloy X surfaces was observed to notably increase the emissivity of the Hastelloy X but was not observed to progress significantly beyond the initial oxidation even with more prolonged exposure. Since there is likely to be initial surface oxidation of any Hastelloy X used in the construction of VHTRs, this represents an essentially neutral finding in terms of the safety implications in postaccident VHTR environments.