ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
April 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
60 Years of U: Perspectives on resources, demand, and the evolving role of nuclear energy
Recent years have seen growing global interest in nuclear energy and rising confidence in the sector. For the first time since the early 2000s, there is renewed optimism about the industry’s future. This change is driven by several major factors: geopolitical developments that highlight the need for secure energy supplies, a stronger focus on resilient energy systems, national commitments to decarbonization, and rising demand for clean and reliable electricity.
William D. Fullmer, Martin A. Lopez De Bertodano
Nuclear Technology | Volume 191 | Number 2 | August 2015 | Pages 185-192
Technical Note | Fission Reactors | doi.org/10.13182/NT14-110
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
One-dimensional two-fluid models used for the simulation of large, industrial-scale problems require many simplifying assumptions to make a closed model that is tractable, applicable to a wide variety of flow regimes, and computationally efficient. Of particular interest here is the virtual mass force and the simplified form used in the RELAP5/MOD3.3 model. Comparison of the characteristics of the simplified model with a more complete two-fluid model for bubbly two-phase flow shows a remarkable similarity. Comparison to experimental data is also surprisingly favorable—provided that the flow conditions are determined appropriately. Namely, the characteristic analysis determined that a drift velocity for distorted bubbly flow, rather than for churn-turbulent flow, matches the data more accurately. The study is concluded by implementing a distorted bubbly drift velocity correlation into the RELAP5/MOD3.3 code. A comparison of the void wave speeds with the data confirms the results of the characteristic analysis.