ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2026
Nuclear Technology
August 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Texas A&M welcomes uranium conversion research
The Texas A&M Engineering Experiment Station (TEES) has signed a research agreement with Quantum Leap Energy (QLE) “to advance and de-risk the commercial production of high-purity uranium hexafluoride (UF6).”
QLE is an Austin, Texas–based subsidiary of ASP Isotopes (ASPI), which is developing an isotope enrichment platform for applications in nuclear energy, nuclear medicine, and semiconductors. QLE specializes in the uranium conversion step of the nuclear fuel cycle—the conversion of yellowcake uranium concentrate (U3O8) into UF6 prior to enrichment.
H. Naik, Meghna Karkera, Vibha Vansola, Santhi Sheela Yeraguntla, Mayur Mehta, R. Makwana, S. V. Suryanarayana
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 200 | Number 8 | August 2026 | Pages 1753-1770
Research Article | doi.org/10.1080/00295639.2025.2545160
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The cumulative yields of various fission products in the 13.75-MeV quasi-mono-energetic neutron-induced fission of 232Th and 238U have been measured using an off-line γ-ray spectrometric technique. The mass chain yields were obtained from the cumulative yields by applying charge distribution correction. From the mass yield data, the peak-to-valley (P/V) ratio, the average value of light mass (< AL>), heavy mass (< AH>), and the average number of neutrons (<ν>) were obtained.
The data from the present work and literature at various neutron energies were compared between the 232Th(n, f) and 238U(n, f) reactions, and the following facts were observed. (1) The mass yield distribution in the 238U(n, f) reaction is double-humped unlike in the 232Th(n, f) reaction, where it is triple-humped. This is due to the different type of potential energy surface for the fissioning system 233Th* than in 239U*. (2) In both reactions, the yields of fission products for A = 133 to 134, A = 138 to 139, and A = 143 to 144 and their complementary products are higher than those of other fission products, which has been explained based on the standard I and standard II asymmetric modes of fission besides the even-odd effect. (3) The yields for A = 133 to 134 are higher in the 238U(n, f) reaction, whereas it is higher for A = 143 to 144 in the 232Th(n, f) reaction, which has been explained based on the presence of shells in the complementary fragments. (4) In both reactions, the yield of symmetric product increases with excitation energy, which causes a decreasing trend in the P/V ratio. (5) At the same excitation energy, the yield of symmetric products is lower in the 238U(n, f) reaction than in the 232Th(n, f) reaction, which causes a higher P/V ratio in the former than in the later.