ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2026
Nuclear Technology
August 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Texas A&M welcomes uranium conversion research
The Texas A&M Engineering Experiment Station (TEES) has signed a research agreement with Quantum Leap Energy (QLE) “to advance and de-risk the commercial production of high-purity uranium hexafluoride (UF6).”
QLE is an Austin, Texas–based subsidiary of ASP Isotopes (ASPI), which is developing an isotope enrichment platform for applications in nuclear energy, nuclear medicine, and semiconductors. QLE specializes in the uranium conversion step of the nuclear fuel cycle—the conversion of yellowcake uranium concentrate (U3O8) into UF6 prior to enrichment.
Farzad Rahnema, Dingkang Zhang
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 200 | Number 4 | April 2026 | Pages 865-876
Research Article | doi.org/10.1080/00295639.2025.2460389
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
In this paper, a new high-order stochastic perturbation method is developed to update the COMET surface-to-surface and fission response functions due to any change in arbitrary magnitude in the density of materials or isotopic atom densities. The method is developed by deriving the relation between the weights of a particle making multiple collisions in the perturbed and unperturbed systems and tallying the Chebyshev expansion moments of the response functions. As a result, the response functions can be updated on the fly during COMET core calculations to account for any arbitrary change in the material density or isotopic atom density. The method is benchmarked in a full-length Advanced High-Temperature Reactor (AHTR) single-assembly problem.
A comparison between the COMET solution using the perturbation method and that using the response function library generated directly by Monte Carlo reveals excellent agreement between the two COMET solutions (i.e. the corresponding eigenvalues and fission density distributions). The difference in the eigenvalues is 2 pcm, which is less than one standard deviation (1 of the stochastic uncertainty in the COMET calculations (7 pcm), and the average relative difference in the stripewise fission densities is 0.12%, which is less than 3 . The perturbation method eliminates the need for precomputing the perturbed responses for the perturbed COMET calculation. This is a savings of the library precomputation time by a factor of 3.66.