ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2026
Nuclear Technology
August 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Texas A&M welcomes uranium conversion research
The Texas A&M Engineering Experiment Station (TEES) has signed a research agreement with Quantum Leap Energy (QLE) “to advance and de-risk the commercial production of high-purity uranium hexafluoride (UF6).”
QLE is an Austin, Texas–based subsidiary of ASP Isotopes (ASPI), which is developing an isotope enrichment platform for applications in nuclear energy, nuclear medicine, and semiconductors. QLE specializes in the uranium conversion step of the nuclear fuel cycle—the conversion of yellowcake uranium concentrate (U3O8) into UF6 prior to enrichment.
Simon Boddington, Tom Taylor, Peter Haigh, Eduardo Cuoc, Chris Hankinson, Luke Godfrey
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 200 | Number 1 | March 2026 | Pages S676-S692
Research Article | doi.org/10.1080/00295639.2025.2524266
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The FLEX reactor, a graphite-moderated two-fluid molten salt reactor concept that will produce energy at a lower cost than unabated coal and gas and could be deployed in the early 2030s, is introduced. Some of the unique features of the FLEX reactor are presented, including: the reactivity control thermometers, a passive replacement for control rods; the residual heat removal system, which passively removes decay heat; and the inherent safety features of the molten salt fuel and coolant. A description of the current reactor physics modeling and validation and verification strategy is provided.
It is argued that the tools and methods selected, which already exist and have been applied to operating nuclear reactors, are appropriate for modeling all relevant physics phenomena for the FLEX reactor. It is also argued that some unique features of circulating-fuel molten salt reactors, such as delayed neutron precursor transport, are of low significance to the FLEX reactor. It is also argued that a specific zero-power reactor is not required for substantiation of the FLEX reactor design or safety case.
A combination of code-to-code comparisons, appropriate benchmarks, and a stepped commissioning procedure for the first-of-a-kind reactor is expected to provide the required level of confidence. Examples of the MoltexFLEX approach to modeling reactor physics phenomena particular to the FLEX reactor are presented. Finally, an appendix is included that contains a more detailed description of the FLEX WIMS model. In this paper reactor physics is defined as including neutronics and reactor kinetics, but not thermal hydraulics.