ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 15–18, 2026
Phoenix, AZ|Arizona Grand Resort & Spa
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2026
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2026
Latest News
Fuel loading process begins at Palisades
The Palisades nuclear power plant has drawn closer to restart, as plant staff began the process of loading fuel into the reactor vessel on Sunday morning.
The commencement of fuel loading places the Covert, Mich., facility in Mode 6—or the refueling stage—under the plant’s technical specifications, plant owner and operator Holtec International said in a news release. The Palisades reactor core consists of 204 fuel assemblies that include new fuel and partially used fuel from the plant’s most recent operating cycles. According to Holtec, the fuel loading is being conducted in accordance with plant procedures and technical specifications.
Pierre Sole, Vaibhav Jaiswal, Cédric Jouanne
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 200 | Number 1 | March 2026 | Pages S659-S675
Research Article | doi.org/10.1080/00295639.2025.2508040
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The propagation of nuclear data uncertainties in neutron transport simulations is typically performed using the “sandwich” formula, which combines a covariance matrix with the sensitivity of the simulation response to the nuclear data. Since most neutron transport codes yield sensitivities on multigroup cross sections, the covariance matrix must be provided between multigroup cross sections. However, in the resonance region, uncertainties are quantified on resonance parameters, such as widths and energies. Modules of processing codes, like PUFF (AMPX) and ERRORR (NJOY), have introduced features to convert the resonance parameter covariance matrix (RPCM) into a covariance matrix on multigroup cross sections, a conversion that is performed using first-order approximations.
Several studies have demonstrated that the use of multigroup uncertainties is not adapted when the neutron flux has significant contributions in the resonance region and the self-shielding effects become important. In the present study, we adopt a similar approach by sampling resonance parameters based on the RPCM, and we propose a strategy for sampling inherently positive resonance parameters using their reduced form. Additionally, we further focus on ENDF evaluations that use the R-Matrix formalism, which allows for the reconstruction of angular distributions of outgoing neutrons from resonance parameters, thus enabling the propagation of resonance uncertainties into the angular distributions within the resonance region.
Among the few nuclei with an available RPCM, we select 63Cu and employ the HMI-006(1) criticality benchmark from the International Criticality Safety Benchmark Evaluation Project database due to its high sensitivity to 63Cu. The module PUFF is capable of processing a RPCM expressed with R-Matrix formalism, conversely to ERRORR, and thus will be use to compare both methods.