ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
April 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Going Nuclear: Notes from the officially unofficial book tour
I work in the analytical labs at one of Europe’s oldest and largest nuclear sites: Sellafield, in northwestern England. I spend my days at the fume hood front, pipette in one hand and radiation probe in the other (and dosimeter pinned to my chest, of course). Outside the lab, I have a second job: I moonlight as a writer and public speaker. My new popular science book—Going Nuclear: How the Atom Will Save the World—came out last summer, and it feels like my life has been running at full power ever since.
Juan A. Monleon de la Lluvia, Mariya Brovchenko, Dimitri Rochman, Eric Dumonteil
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 200 | Number 2 | February 2026 | Pages 257-279
Research Article | doi.org/10.1080/00295639.2025.2510048
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
This study explores methodologies for propagating nuclear data uncertainties in radiation shielding calculations. The work is motivated by the aging of pressurized water reactor vessels, where quantifying uncertainties can contribute to improved risk assessment. In this context, the present analysis serves as a preliminary step toward more complex, application-specific scenarios. Two approaches are considered: first-order second-moment (FOSM) sensitivity analysis and Monte Carlo sampling (MCS), both implemented through MCNP6.3. In the FOSM approach, we examine the use of variance reduction in combination with sensitivity calculations, while the MCS method is optimized to address its higher computational demand. Our analysis revealed discrepancies in certain cases when applying variance reduction with sensitivity calculations, which may compromise its applicability under certain conditions. Conversely, the MCS approach, using Sobol and Latin hypercube sampling with fast Total Monte Carlo or Fast GRS techniques, yielded results comparable to FOSM. These findings suggest that using MCS for propagating nuclear data uncertainties in shielding problems should be feasible, while maintaining computational demand similar to that of traditional first-order methods. Future work will test this approach in more complex, realistic configurations.