ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2026
Nuclear Technology
September 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2026
Latest News
Diversification and the common ground
Craig Piercycpiercy@ans.org
Who would have thought, just a few years ago, that we would see so many long-standing barriers to new nuclear development falling like dominoes? Public opinion, policy, regulatory reform, finance and investment, design maturity, nuclear fuel enrichment, and fuel fabrication capacity have all advanced with remarkable speed in the United States.
Conventional wisdom holds that the most effective way to scale up the nuclear supply chain is to do so strategically, matching investments to the needs of reactor developers.
J. Rogers, Y. Parlatan
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 199 | Number 12 | December 2025 | Pages 2055-2065
Research Article | doi.org/10.1080/00295639.2025.2462895
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
This paper describes the development of a statistical model of uncertainty in channel powers predicted for a 480-channel CANada Deuterium Uranium (CANDU) reactor. It is expressed as the sum of ripple prediction uncertainty and reactor power uncertainty. Ripples are ratios of instantaneous channel powers (prorated to 100% of full power) to reference channel powers. The ripple prediction uncertainty model is a multivariate normal distribution whose covariance matrix captures a unique variance for every channel as well as a unique covariance between every pair of channels. Reactor power uncertainty is common to all 480 channels.
Central to this work is the distinction between apparent uncertainty, measurement uncertainty, and prediction uncertainty. Ripple prediction uncertainty is quantified by removing the contribution of ripple measurement uncertainty to ripple apparent uncertainty (differences between computer code–predicted ripples and measured ripples). This is done because measurement uncertainty causes apparent uncertainty to exceed prediction uncertainty. Measurement uncertainty is quantified using a novel approach referred to as the sister channel approach with time shifting. This approach uses differences between measured ripples in sister channels to quantify actual measurement uncertainty. The time-shifting aspect of the approach accounts for the fact that true ripples in sister channels are not identical at the same time, mainly because sister channels and their neighboring channels are refueled at different times.