ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2026
Nuclear Technology
September 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2026
Latest News
Diversification and the common ground
Craig Piercycpiercy@ans.org
Who would have thought, just a few years ago, that we would see so many long-standing barriers to new nuclear development falling like dominoes? Public opinion, policy, regulatory reform, finance and investment, design maturity, nuclear fuel enrichment, and fuel fabrication capacity have all advanced with remarkable speed in the United States.
Conventional wisdom holds that the most effective way to scale up the nuclear supply chain is to do so strategically, matching investments to the needs of reactor developers.
C. Sartoris, J.-A. Zambaux, F. Fichot
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 199 | Number 10 | October 2025 | Pages 1581-1596
Research Article | doi.org/10.1080/00295639.2024.2357943
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
In case of a severe accident in a light water reactor, a debris bed may form in the core and possibly melt, as happened in Three Mile Island Unit 2. Knowledge about the coolability of such a molten pool surrounded by debris is crucial to investigate the possibility of stabilizing a part of the fuel inside the vessel. In particular, it is of primary interest to determine the maximum size of a molten pool surrounded by debris that may be stabilized under water. A key parameter is the maximum heat flux [critical heat flux (CHF)] that may be extracted from the pool boundary by water flowing within the debris bed. A facility was built at IRSN to determine the CHF under various conditions. A heated copper surface simulates the boundary of the pool and is placed in contact with a debris bed (monodisperse steel balls), under water. In this article, we first complete previous experimental work with steam and liquid flow rates, ball diameter, tilting angle of the heated surface, and pressure up to 2.5 bar absolute. A general CHF correlation depending on the tilting angle and the steam flow rate is derived, and an example of the use of this correlation to evaluate the maximum mass of the corium pool that can be stabilized under water is given, for some typical reactor conditions. In the last part of the article, the accuracy of the ASTEC code is evaluated based on first calculations intending to reproduce the experimental impact of liquid and steam flow rates.