ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Apr 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
May 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
OSTP memo guides space nuclear plan
A White House Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) memorandum released on Tuesday guides NASA, the Department of Energy, and the Department of Defense on their roles in deploying near-term space nuclear power.
This follows a series of NASA announcements last month—driven by the executive order “Ensuring American Space Superiority,” issued by Trump in December—including an ambitious timeline for establishing a moon base, which would rely on fission surface power (FSP) to survive the long lunar night at the moon’s south pole, and plans for a nuclear electric propulsion (NEP) rocket to be launched in 2028.
Nikolai Vododokhov, Kendall Erlandson, David R. Novog
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 199 | Number 9 | September 2025 | Pages 1492-1511
Research Article | doi.org/10.1080/00295639.2025.2455353
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Nuclear energy provides a low-carbon source of electricity that provides consistent and reliable power in a cost-effective manner. However, the accident at Fukushima Daiichi in 2011 demonstrated several important lessons on nuclear power plant severe events and risk mitigation and led to important changes in designs, improvement in emergency planning, and better understanding of external event hazards. Since 2011, the Fukushima accident has also led to new methodologies to characterize risk for low-probability events such as station blackout (SBO). In particular, large external events that lead to loss of Class IV power, and subsequent failures of backup power (Class III power) and or emergency power, and where the outcome may be dependent on human/emergency response functions, require additional methodological development to better quantify the risks and consequences. Dynamic Probabilistic Safety Assessment (D-PSA) is a set of stochastic tools that allows the integration of technology availability (e.g. as in standard Probabilistic Safety Assessment), human action probability, uncertainty in predictive models, and possible deviations in the timing of any automatic or human-initiated actions. It allows the analysis of accident consequences with different mitigation strategies and action timings and can include the evaluation of both safety (e.g. dose) and/or economic consequences. It can also be used as part of a larger risk informed methodology such as the Risk Informed Safety Margin Characterization approach proposed by the U.S. Light Water Reactor Sustainability (LWRS) Program to rank safety system and operator actions in terms of their probable impact on an event. The RAVEN framework developed under the LWRS Program is used as a D-PSA driver along with the TRACE thermal-hydraulic code to quantify risk evolution during transient event sequences. This paper uses the Dynamic Event Tree approach to analyze the critical time to failure for a SBO in a CANada Deuterium Uranium (CANDU) power plant and the impact of system reliabilities and timing on event outcomes.