ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Apr 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
May 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
OSTP memo guides space nuclear plan
A White House Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) memorandum released on Tuesday guides NASA, the Department of Energy, and the Department of Defense on their roles in deploying near-term space nuclear power.
This follows a series of NASA announcements last month—driven by the executive order “Ensuring American Space Superiority,” issued by Trump in December—including an ambitious timeline for establishing a moon base, which would rely on fission surface power (FSP) to survive the long lunar night at the moon’s south pole, and plans for a nuclear electric propulsion (NEP) rocket to be launched in 2028.
Johan Cufe, Daniele Tomatis
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 199 | Number 1 | April 2025 | Pages S710-S729
Research Article | doi.org/10.1080/00295639.2024.2333088
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The Ronen Method (RM) is a nonlinear iterative scheme that demands successive resolutions of the diffusion equation, where local diffusion constants are modified to reproduce more accurate estimates of the neutron currents by a transport operator. The methodology is currently formulated using the formalism of the collision probability method for evaluation of the current. The RM was recently tested on a complete suite of one-dimensional (1-D) multigroup benchmark problems. Small differences in the flux (less than 2%) were reported at material interfaces and close to the vacuum boundary with respect to the reference solution from transport.
This work investigates first a possible numerical equivalence between transport and diffusion in some representative 1-D problems from the same benchmark test suite. The equivalence is sought with optimal diffusion coefficients computed using reference transport solutions that allow for adjusting the diffusion model. The RM, which attempts to obtain such equivalent diffusion coefficients without knowing the reference solution, is then compared to the optimal coefficients. The accuracy of the flux distribution at material interfaces is investigated for different approximations of the vacuum boundary and by decreasing progressively the RM convergence tolerance set in the iterative scheme.
Using tighter convergence criteria, the RM calculates more accurate flux distributions at all material interfaces, regardless of the value of the diffusion coefficient and the extrapolated distance set at the beginning of the iterative scheme. Maximum flux deviations are remarkably reduced when the RM convergence tolerance is set to eight or more significant digits, leading to improvements in the flux deviation of two orders in magnitude and providing numerical proof for equivalence with transport in the tested configurations.