ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2026
Nuclear Technology
September 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2026
Latest News
Diversification and the common ground
Craig Piercycpiercy@ans.org
Who would have thought, just a few years ago, that we would see so many long-standing barriers to new nuclear development falling like dominoes? Public opinion, policy, regulatory reform, finance and investment, design maturity, nuclear fuel enrichment, and fuel fabrication capacity have all advanced with remarkable speed in the United States.
Conventional wisdom holds that the most effective way to scale up the nuclear supply chain is to do so strategically, matching investments to the needs of reactor developers.
Masahiro Fukushima, Masaki Andoh, Yasunobu Nagaya
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 199 | Number 6 | June 2025 | Pages 1029-1043
Note | doi.org/10.1080/00295639.2024.2405668
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A series of simulated experiments were conducted at the fast critical assembly (FCA) of the Japan Atomic Energy Agency to simulate a light water reactor core with a tight lattice cell containing highly enriched mixed-oxide fuel with a fissile plutonium (Pu) ratio >15%. The prediction accuracy of the neutron computation codes and nuclear data libraries in a wide range of neutron spectra was evaluated by constructing three experimental configurations of the FCA-XXII-1 assembly with different void fractions (45%, 65%, and 95%) of the moderator material (foamed polystyrene). The hydrogen-to–nuclear fuel atomic ratio was systematically varied from 0.1 to 0.8. In a previous paper, we reported the criticality and reactivity worths measured in these experiments.
This technical note provides the experimental results for the central reaction rate ratios and fission distributions as follows. The fission rate ratios of uranium (U) (238U) and 239Pu relative to 235U were measured at the core centers using three calibrated fission chambers, and the 238U capture reaction rate ratio relative to 235U fission was measured using depleted U foils. The reaction rate distributions were also obtained by traversing four micro fission chambers of highly enriched U, natural U, Pu, and neptunium through each core region in the radial and axial directions. The experimental analyses were performed using detailed models of the Monte Carlo code MVP3 with the Japanese evaluated nuclear data library of JENDL-4.0. Most calculation results agreed well with the experiments, whereas those for the fission rate ratio of 239Pu to 235U were underestimated by up to 6% with the softening neutron spectrum.