ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
August 2026
Nuclear Technology
July 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Long-term strategy calls for up to 10 new reactors in Canada
Canada has launched a Nuclear Energy Strategy, a long-term vision of its nuclear power potential that includes plans to deploy up to 10 new large-scale reactors in the country by 2040.
The June 22 announcement, along with ongoing projects at Darlington and Bruce Power, further confirm Canada's ambitions to expand its nuclear power presence not just domestically but also abroad. Four pillars stand at the heart of the country’s Nuclear Energy Strategy: new nuclear builds in Canada, maintaining its status as a top nuclear supplier and exporter, expanding uranium production, and continuing nuclear fission and fusion innovations.
Fred D. Lang
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 199 | Number 6 | June 2025 | Pages 1010-1028
Research Article | doi.org/10.1080/00295639.2024.2406724
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
This work proposes a paradigm shift in nuclear safety. Its NCV Method (neutronics/calorimetrics/verification procedures) integrates nuclear power’s motive force—neutron flux—within Second Law exergy analysis, coupled with corrected conservation of energy flows, both descriptive of the entire system. These descriptions with two satellite equations result in a verifiable understanding of the nuclear engine: neutron flux [or neutronic terms f (Φ)], useful power produced, and system heat rejection, all coupled to reactor vessel coolant mass flow. Key to NCV is its assumption that all nuclear phenomena are inertial processes, devoid of terrestrial reference. This approach demands reinterpretation of Einstein’s ΔE = c2Δm by describing his ΔE as an exergetic potential, an ultimate Free Exergy. For fission, Free Exergy consists of both recoverable and irreversible portions given a total MeV release. In transference to the coolant, the recoverable release produces an exergetic increase (Δg) in the fluid; an explicitly calculated Inertial Conversion Factor produces a computed Core Thermal Power (Δh) and a nuclear TRef.
This paper asserts that traditional nuclear engineering has lacked direct linkage between neutron flux and system fluid thermodynamics. With NCV, nuclear power’s motive force is explicitly related to extensive properties, thus allowing reconciliation of principal system parameters of the nuclear engine (fission source, power out, heat rejection, and main system flow). Principal verification is accomplished by comparing the computed useful power to that which is directly measured. The NCV method has the potential to reduce uncertainty in computed Core Thermal Power from its commonly accepted ±2% by an order of magnitude. Its ability to improve plant safety becomes intrinsic, for example: ● tracking changes in verifiable flux versus reactor vessel coolant flow; ● tracking changes in the axial position where saturation may be approached, and the position of the average coolant temperature; ● monitoring the instantaneously computed flux versus reactor vessel pump currents; ● detecting changes in the important ΔλGEN and ΔλEQ40 verification parameters, which compare the computed shaft power delivered to the generator, to the measured; ● surveilling component irreversible losses using Fission Consumption Indices; etc.
● tracking changes in verifiable flux versus reactor vessel coolant flow;
● tracking changes in the axial position where saturation may be approached, and the position of the average coolant temperature;
● monitoring the instantaneously computed flux versus reactor vessel pump currents;
● detecting changes in the important ΔλGEN and ΔλEQ40 verification parameters, which compare the computed shaft power delivered to the generator, to the measured;
● surveilling component irreversible losses using Fission Consumption Indices; etc.