ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
May 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
June 2026
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
South Korea looks to Southern and NuScale
This week, the United States and South Korea have taken two steps toward deepening their nuclear partnership through two notable announcements. First, the majority-state owned Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power signed a memorandum of understanding with Birmingham, Ala.–based Southern Nuclear.
Virginie Solans, Henrik Sjöstrand, Sophie Grape, Erik Branger, Anders Sjöland
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 199 | Number 6 | June 2025 | Pages 930-940
Research Article | doi.org/10.1080/00295639.2024.2406655
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
In the context of a geological repository for nuclear waste, fast and accurate predictions of decay heat are needed for different applications ranging from canister loading optimization to comparing decay heat predictions from state-of-the-art codes with experimental measurements. This work uses a large database of simulated pressurized water reactor (PWR) spent nuclear fuel (SNF) with an extensive range of fuel parameters to demonstrate that by using only the burnup, initial enrichment, and cooling time of the SNF, it is possible to predict the decay heat of a PWR SNF.
A linear interpolation model has been developed using the simulated data and tested on data from decay heat measurements using a calorimeter. The model code was also made publicly available [V. Solans, “Python Script for the Prediction of Decay Heat from PWR Spent Nuclear Fuel Using Fuel Parameters,” Zenodo (2024)]. The results show that the decay heat can be well predicted, with the relative error between measurements and predictions ranging between 4% and 8%. After correcting for a systematic deviation between predictions and experimental results using the limited set of experimental measurement data available, the relative error can be further reduced to 2% to 3%.