ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2026
Nuclear Technology
September 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2026
Latest News
Diversification and the common ground
Craig Piercycpiercy@ans.org
Who would have thought, just a few years ago, that we would see so many long-standing barriers to new nuclear development falling like dominoes? Public opinion, policy, regulatory reform, finance and investment, design maturity, nuclear fuel enrichment, and fuel fabrication capacity have all advanced with remarkable speed in the United States.
Conventional wisdom holds that the most effective way to scale up the nuclear supply chain is to do so strategically, matching investments to the needs of reactor developers.
Cheol Ho Pyeon, Akito Oizumi, Ryota Katano, Masahiro Fukushima
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 199 | Number 3 | March 2025 | Pages 429-444
Research Article | doi.org/10.1080/00295639.2024.2380624
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Experimental analyses of 237Np, 241Am, and 243Am fission, as well as 237Np capture reaction rates, are conducted with the Serpent 2 code together with ENDF/B-VIII.0 and JENDL-5 using experimental data for the neutron spectra of thermal and intermediate regions obtained in the solid-moderated and solid-reflected cores with highly enriched uranium fuel at the Kyoto University Critical Assembly. Also, uncertainty quantification of the fission and capture reaction rate ratios of the test samples of 237Np, 241Am, and 243Am with reference samples of 235U and 197Au are evaluated by the MARBLE code system.
In terms of the fission reaction rate ratios of 237Np/235U, 241Am/235U, and 243Am/235U, a comparison between experiments and Serpent 2 calculations shows an accuracy of about 5%, 15%, and 10%, respectively, together with ENDF/B-VIII.0 and JENDL-5. For the capture reaction rate ratios of 237Np/197Au, Serpent 2 calculations reveal a fairly good accuracy at the thermal neutron spectrum. The total uncertainties of the 237Np/235U, 241Am/235U, and 243Am/235U fission reaction rate ratios by MARBLE with the covariance data of ENDF/B-VIII.0 and JENDL-5 are found to be about 4% at most in all cores, except for about 8% for 243Am/235U with ENDF/B-VIII.0 at the intermediate neutron spectrum.