ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
September 8–11, 2025
Atlanta, GA|Atlanta Marriott Marquis
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2025
Latest News
New report lays out path to U.S. nuclear energy dominance
The new report “How America Can Achieve Nuclear Energy Dominance,” from the Working Group on U.S. Nuclear Energy Dominance, outlines a plan of action for the Trump administration that includes deploying new nuclear reactors, developing domestic supply chains, promoting nuclear exports, reforming regulations, and developing the workforce.
Working group chair Todd Abrajano said, “We welcome the Trump administration’s bold moves to kick-start the U.S. nuclear energy sector, but we recognize that President Trump’s executive orders alone can’t achieve our goals.”
Olin W. Calvin, Namjae Choi
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 198 | Number 6 | June 2024 | Pages 1255-1275
Research Article | doi.org/10.1080/00295639.2023.2241807
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The Chebyshev Rational Approximation Method (CRAM) has become one of the dominant methods for solving the Bateman equations for nuclear fuel depletion analysis. Since its introduction over a decade ago, several improvements have been made to CRAM improving its accuracy and reducing its run time. We analyzed its run time using two previously published methods for solving the CRAM system of equations, direct matrix inversion (DMI) and sparse Gaussian elimination (SGE), for depletion systems of varying numbers of nuclides to see how the two methods perform relative to one another. In addition to these two methods, we introduced the Gauss-Seidel (GS) method for solving the CRAM system of equations and compared its performance relative to DMI and SGE for depletion systems with varying numbers of nuclides. We demonstrated that for practical purposes, GS is faster than SGE and DMI and achieves a practical level of accuracy. All testing was performed using the CRAM implementation in the Griffin reactor physics analysis application.