ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
July 2026
Nuclear Technology
June 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
Tennessee fusion regulations take effect
On June 9, Tennessee became the first U.S. state to implement its own regulatory framework for nuclear fusion machines. It’s a notable step in the rapidly developing field of fusion regulation, and will help Tennessee prepare to regulate Type One Energy’s proposed commercial fusion power plant near Oak Ridge.
Rowayda Fayez M Abou Alo, Amr Abdelhady, Mohamed K. Shaat
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 198 | Number 5 | May 2024 | Pages 1122-1130
Research Article | doi.org/10.1080/00295639.2023.2227837
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The transfer of nuclear spent fuel from the reactor storage pool to dry storage or for reprocessing or final disposition requires information about its isotopic composition, decay heat, and other thermomechanical properties. The spent nuclear fuel assembly of a typical advanced pressurized water reactor, AP-1000, was characterized using the Monte Carlo MCNPX code and SCALE/ORIGEN code. The simulation of operational history started from the operation of the first fresh core for an average fuel assembly with certain physical isotopic parameters until 25 GWd/tonne U discharge burnup.
The analysis considered the calculations of the radionuclide inventories, activity, neutron emission spectrum, gamma-ray emission spectrum, and decay power after 700 effective full power days and for post different time ranges until a 1 million–year cooling period. The comparison of some results of the two codes showed small differences due to the consideration of the continuous-energy variation for neutrons in the MCNPX code and the discrete energy assumption in the SCALE/ORIGEN code.