ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 15–18, 2026
Phoenix, AZ|Arizona Grand Resort & Spa
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2026
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2026
Latest News
Fuel loading process begins at Palisades
The Palisades nuclear power plant has drawn closer to restart, as plant staff began the process of loading fuel into the reactor vessel on Sunday morning.
The commencement of fuel loading places the Covert, Mich., facility in Mode 6—or the refueling stage—under the plant’s technical specifications, plant owner and operator Holtec International said in a news release. The Palisades reactor core consists of 204 fuel assemblies that include new fuel and partially used fuel from the plant’s most recent operating cycles. According to Holtec, the fuel loading is being conducted in accordance with plant procedures and technical specifications.
Kumar S. Mohindroo, Thomas Miller, Igor Remec
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 198 | Number 2 | February 2024 | Pages 311-318
Research Article | doi.org/10.1080/00295639.2023.2191584
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The Second Target Station project at Oak Ridge National Laboratory will develop a cold neutron source to meet growing experimental needs. This paper describes calculations of the residual dose rates associated with the monolith shield plug and the beamline bunker, two key conventional operations and radiation safety features. While neutron production is active, the instrument hall outside the bunker must be generally accessible with dose rates of less than 0.25 mrem/h. When neutron production is halted, the bunker must be accessible for hands-on maintenance operations. These two requirements form the cause for the assessments reported herein of residual dose rates caused by the monolith shield plug and residual dose rates in the bunker. The monolith shield plug was shown to not produce significant dose rates inside the bunker after a 20-year lifetime, and the residual dose rates inside the bunker for the case of an operating beamline were shown to reasonably allow for hands-on maintenance. These calculations are based on preliminary design models of the relevant systems. Additionally, an example showing the significance of considering neutron supermirror physics in transport calculations that track nuclide production and destruction rates to produce gamma sources for residual dose rate calculations is included. The example shows that if neutron supermirror physics is not considered, dose rate fields may be significantly underpredicted.