ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2026
Nuclear Technology
September 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2026
Latest News
A closer look at the initial NLIC selections—Part 2
In January, the Department of Energy announced its new Nuclear Lifecycle Innovation Campus (NLIC) program, inviting states via a request for information to express their interest in hosting a facility supporting work from the front to the back end of the nuclear fuel cycle.
By April, 26 states had expressed interest in hosting such a facility. At the end of July, the DOE signed memorandums of understanding with five states—Idaho, Louisiana, Oklahoma, Tennessee, and Utah—to more closely explore the possibilities of state-federal partnerships. These MOUs are not firm commitments from either the federal or state governments. Time will tell which—if any—of the five states develop projects through the program. In the meantime, today, we are taking a close look at what Utah, Idaho, Tennessee can offer in terms of a preexisting nuclear sector that could support new fuel cycle developments.
Hongyi Yang, Hongrui Li, Xiuli Xue, Zhiwei Zhou
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 196 | Number 3 | March 2022 | Pages 285-300
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.1080/00295639.2021.1973177
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The sodium flow resistance in sodium-cooled fast reactor cores experiencing natural circulation conditions was measured for wire-wrapped 19- and 37-pin bundles using low-velocity water flows with Re <1000 and Re <750, respectively. The measurements were compared with predictions of existing wire-wrapped bundle friction factor correlations. The results show that the existing correlations usually underestimate the friction factors in the transition flow regime particularly for those with small transition Reynolds numbers from laminar to turbulent flow. The reason for the underestimation is that the transition Reynolds numbers observed in this study were much smaller than the predictions of all the existing correlations, and as a result, the transition flow at the small Reynolds number was treated as laminar or quasi-laminar flow by the correlations. In addition, the quasi turbulence in the early stage of transition flow should have a significant influence on flow resistance.