ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2026
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
February 2026
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
January 2026
Latest News
From uncertainty to vitality: The future of nuclear energy in Illinois
Nuclear is enjoying a bit of a resurgence. The momentum for reliable energy to support economic development around the country—specifically data centers and AI—remains strong, and strongly in favor of nuclear. And as feature coverage on the states in the January 2026 issue of Nuclear News made abundantly clear, many states now see nuclear as necessary to support rising electricity demand while maintaining a reliable grid and reaching decarbonization goals.
Thanh-Tuan Tran, Thi-Mai-Trang Le, Phu-Cuong Nguyen, Dookie Kim, Thong M. Pham, Kashif Salman, Seongkyu Chang
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 195 | Number 12 | December 2021 | Pages 1327-1346
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.1080/00295639.2021.1920796
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
This study presents the Probabilistic Seismic Demand Model (PSDM) and explores optimal intensity measures (IMs) for nuclear power plant (NPP) equipment when subjected to ground motions having high-frequency (HF) and low-frequency (LF) contents. To this end, the PSDM is first constructed in terms of the IM and the corresponding engineering demand parameter, and its outcomes are utilized to select the optimum IMs based on the satisfaction of certain essential properties (i.e., efficiency, practicality, and proficiency). Regarding earthquake excitation, different IMs (i.e., structure-independent and structure-dependent IMs) are studied. The results show that the most appropriate IMs for the seismic performance of the cabinet are velocity spectrum intensity and spectral accelerations for the structure-independent IMs and the structure-dependent IMs, respectively.
Moreover, fragility analysis is performed to assess the vulnerability of NPP equipment. The outcomes indicate that the cabinet is highly vulnerable to HF earthquakes as a consequence of response amplification. In addition, the selection of the earthquake IM has an important influence on the collapse capacity of the cabinet, and the fragility curves obtained from structure-dependent IMs are more reliable in comparison to those of structure-independent IMs.