ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
July 2026
Nuclear Technology
June 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
Spent fuel recycling and conditioning topic of U.S.-Japan meeting
Officials with the Department of Energy’s Office of Environmental Management discussed spent nuclear fuel recycling and conditioning with counterparts from Japan during the 13th U.S.-Japan Technical Meeting of the Civil Nuclear Energy Research and Development Working Group, held recently in Santa Fe, N.M.
Hwanyeal Yu, Seongdong Jang, Yonghee Kim
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 195 | Number 7 | July 2021 | Pages 766-777
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.1080/00295639.2020.1867435
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Based on embedded analysis, an accurate pin power reconstruction (PPR) method is proposed for conventional nodal analysis. Unlike the common form function (FF) method, the new PPR method, named the embedded pin power reconstruction (EPPR) method, directly solves a two-group fixed-source problem that is defined with pinwise homogenized group constants (HGCs) and coarse-mesh incoming partial currents on the boundary. In the EPPR scheme, the pinwise HGCs including the pinwise discontinuity factor are predetermined from single-assembly lattice calculations, and the boundary partial currents are obtained from two-step nodal analyses. Two EPPR approaches are proposed: One is a 3×3 extended color-set configuration, and the other is a smaller one considering the half-thickness of the surrounding fuel assemblies. The performance of the EPPR methods is evaluated with various benchmark problems including partially mixed oxide–loaded pressurized water reactor cores, and the results are compared with the conventional FF method. Comprehensive results of this work demonstrate that the new EPPR method can provide much better accuracy than the conventional FF-based PPR method.