ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Dec 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
December 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
November 2025
Latest News
My Story: John L. Swanson—ANS member since 1978
. . . and in 2019, on his 90th birthday.
Swanson in 1951, the year of his college graduation . . .
My pre-college years were spent in a rural suburb of Tacoma, Wash. In 1947, I enrolled in Reed College, a small liberal arts school in Portland, Ore.; I majored in chemistry and graduated in 1951. While at Reed, I met and married a young lady with whom I would raise 3 children and spend the next 68 years of my life—almost all of them in Richland, Wash., where I still live.
I was fortunate to have a job each of my “college summers” that provided enough money to cover my college costs for the next year; I don’t think that is possible these days. My job was in the kitchen/dining hall of a salmon cannery in Alaska. Room and board were provided and the cannery was in an isolated location, so I could save almost every dollar of my salary.
Chen Wang, Xu Wu, Tomasz Kozlowski
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 193 | Number 1 | January-February 2019 | Pages 100-114
Technical Paper – Selected papers from NURETH 2017 | doi.org/10.1080/00295639.2018.1499279
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
In the framework of Best Estimate Plus Uncertainty methodology, the uncertainties involved in model predictions must be quantified to prove that the investigated design is reasonable and acceptable. The uncertainties in predictions are usually calculated by propagating input uncertainties through the simulation model, which requires knowledge of the model or code input uncertainties, for example, the means, variances, distribution types, etc. However, in best-estimate system thermal-hydraulic codes such as TRACE, some parameters in empirical correlations may have large uncertainties that are unknown to code users, and their uncertainties are therefore simply ignored or described by expert opinion.
In this paper, the issue of missing uncertainty information for physical model parameters in the thermal-hydraulic code TRACE is addressed with inverse uncertainty quantification (IUQ), using the steady-state void fraction experimental data in the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development/Nuclear Energy Agency PSBT (Pressurized water reactor Sub-channel and Bundle Tests benchmark. The IUQ process is formulated through a Bayesian perspective, which can yield the posterior distributions of the uncertain inputs. A Gaussian process emulator is employed to significantly reduce the computational burden involved in sampling the posteriors using the Markov Chain Monte Carlo method. The posterior distributions are further used in forward uncertainty quantification and sensitivity analysis to quantify the influences of those parameters on the quantities of interest. The results demonstrate the effectiveness of the IUQ framework with a practical nuclear engineering example and show the necessity of quantifying and reducing uncertainty of physical model parameters in future work.