ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Dec 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
January 2026
Nuclear Technology
December 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
November 2025
Latest News
DNFSB spots possible bottleneck in Hanford’s waste vitrification
Workers change out spent 27,000-pound TSCR filter columns and place them on a nearby storage pad during a planned outage in 2023. (Photo: DOE)
While the Department of Energy recently celebrated the beginning of hot commissioning of the Hanford Site’s Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP), which has begun immobilizing the site’s radioactive tank waste in glass through vitrification, the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board has reported a possible bottleneck in waste processing. According to the DNFSB, unless current systems run efficiently, the issue could result in the interruption of operations at the WTP’s Low-Activity Waste Facility, where waste vitrification takes place.
During operations, the LAW Facility will process an average of 5,300 gallons of tank waste per day, according to Bechtel, the contractor leading design, construction, and commissioning of the WTP. That waste is piped to the facility after being treated by Hanford’s Tanks Side Cesium Removal (TSCR) system, which filters undissolved solid material and removes cesium from liquid waste.
According to a November 7 activity report by the DNFSB, the TSCR system may not be able to produce waste feed fast enough to keep up with the LAW Facility’s vitrification rate.
S. Varet, P. Dossantos-Uzarralde, N. Vayatis
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 179 | Number 4 | April 2015 | Pages 398-410
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE14-07
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
For evaluated nuclear cross-section uncertainties, most standard approaches are based on experimental cross-section measurements, reflecting that these measurements have uncertainty on their own and, in particular, undetermined correlations. We propose here focusing on the estimation of experimental covariances and bypassing the direct empirical estimator, which cannot be used due to the small amount of available data. Because of the nonlinearity of experimental cross sections, an alternative method to the classical propagation error formula is presented. This method exploits a regression model of the experimental cross sections to generate pseudomeasurements and thereby allows an empirical estimation of experimental covariances. Moreover, thanks to a bootstrap, a quality measure for the estimation is provided. The empirical matrix estimation is then improved with shrinkage. The validity of the approach is confirmed through numerical experiments on a toy model. Finally, the procedure is applied to the real case of the 5525Mn nucleus.