ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
April 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
NRC to add new items to categorical exclusions list
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has identified five categories of action to add to its list of categorical exclusions to reduce its documentation work under National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) procedures.
These revisions are included in the final rule, “Categorical exclusions from environmental review,” which was published in the Federal Register on March 30. The final rule will become effective on April 29.
A. Santamarina, P. Leconte, D. Bernard, G. Truchet
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 178 | Number 4 | December 2014 | Pages 562-581
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE14-50
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The CERES collaborative program between the French Atomic Energy Commission (CEA) and the United Kingdom Atomic Energy Agency (UKAEA) was performed in the MINERVE and DIMPLE reactors at Cadarache and Winfrith, respectively. CERES Phase II was devoted to the validation of fission product (FP) poisoning through the reactivity worth measurements of FP samples. This paper describes the oscillation experiment at the center of the MINERVE pressurized water reactor–type test lattice. This experiment is strongly representative of the FP poisoning in light water reactor spent fuels because the separated FP isotope is introduced into real UO2 pellets where 238U/iFP resonance overlap occurs. In order to preserve the experimental results within the International Reactor Physics Experiment Evaluation international database, slight corrections to define a two-dimensional benchmark are presented. The evaluation of experimental uncertainties is detailed. Therefore, the accurate APOLLO2.8 analysis of this benchmark is described, using recent JEFF-3.1.1 and ENDF/B-VII.0 nuclear data files. JEFF-3.1.1 FP worth is particularly satisfactory, except for 153Eu, which is underestimated by 8.1% + 2.6%. The CERES integral measurement data also suggest improvements to 99Tc and 145Nd evaluations in the ENDF/B-VII.0 library.
