ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
April 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Going Nuclear: Notes from the officially unofficial book tour
I work in the analytical labs at one of Europe’s oldest and largest nuclear sites: Sellafield, in northwestern England. I spend my days at the fume hood front, pipette in one hand and radiation probe in the other (and dosimeter pinned to my chest, of course). Outside the lab, I have a second job: I moonlight as a writer and public speaker. My new popular science book—Going Nuclear: How the Atom Will Save the World—came out last summer, and it feels like my life has been running at full power ever since.
Bernard S. Finn, James W. Wade
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 7 | Number 2 | February 1960 | Pages 93-96
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE60-A29076
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The effects of H2O contamination on lattices of natural uranium metal in D2O were measured in the exponential facility of the Savannah River Laboratory. The buckling changes associated with H2O contamination were determined for two lattices with moderator-to-fuel volume ratios of 12.3 and 14.6 over a range of H2O concentrations from 0.2 to 8.2 mol %. The agreement between calculated and experimental changes in buckling for these lattices was within ±25 × 10−6 cm−2. Similar measurements on seven other lattices with moderator-to-fuel ratios in the range from 31 to 212 were made for a change in the H2O concentration from 0.18 to 3.92 mol %. For these measurements the experimental change in buckling was about 15% greater than the calculated change.