ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Apr 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
June 2026
Nuclear Technology
March 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
DOE selects first companies for nuclear launch pad
The Department of Energy’s Office of Nuclear Energy and the National Reactor Innovation Center have announced their first selections for the Nuclear Energy Launch Pad: three companies developing microreactors and one developing fuel supply.
The four companies—Deployable Energy, General Matter, NuCube Energy, and Radiant Industries—were selected from the initial pool of Reactor Pilot Program and Fuel Line Pilot Program applicants, the two precursor programs to the launch pad.
L. W. Deitrich, T. J. Connolly
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 50 | Number 3 | March 1973 | Pages 273-282
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE73-A28980
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
This paper reports a study of bubble nucleation by fission fragments in superheated water. The experimental work was conducted using a small bubble chamber especially built for the program. The minimum superheat necessary for nucleation of visible bubbles by fission fragments (the threshold) was measured at temperatures between 380 and 440°F.Predictions of the threshold are based on comparison of the energy and linear energy transfer (LET) of fission fragments with the values required for bubble nucleation. Because of the variation in fission-fragment energy, the comparison is made on the basis of the median, 80’th percentile, and maximum energy and LET of the fragments present in the experiment.The data indicate that the LET comparison is the appropriate basis for prediction of the threshold. Using an empirically adjusted value of the LET required for nucleation, the calculated threshold agrees reasonably well with the data but becomes increasingly discrepant with increasing temperature. Reasons for deviation of the data from predictions are discussed, but a definitive determination cannot be made on the basis of the available data.