ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
May 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
June 2026
Nuclear Technology
April 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Nuclear Energy Strategy announced at CNA2026
At the Canadian Nuclear Association Conference (CNA2026) in Ottawa, Ontario, on April 29, Minister of Energy and Natural Resources Tim Hodgson announced that Natural Resources Canada (NRCan) is developing a new Nuclear Energy Strategy for the country. The strategy, which is slated to be released by the end of this year, will be based on four objectives: 1) enabling new nuclear builds across Canada, 2) being a global supplier and exporter of nuclear technology and services, 3) expanding uranium production and nuclear fuel opportunities, and 4) developing new Canadian nuclear innovations, including in both fission and fusion technologies.
G. C. Baldwin
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 6 | Number 4 | October 1959 | Pages 320-327
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE59-A28851
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The kinetics of the two-core configuration of the Argonaut reactor is examined. In this reactor two slightly subcritical slabs two feet apart are immersed in a large graphite reflector. The system achieves criticality by the small interaction due to exchange of thermal neutrons between the cores. The kinetic equations are derived by including an interaction term with the source terms of the thermal neutron diffusion equation, and writing a separate diffusion equation for each slab. This analysis accounts for observations that the ratio of flux levels in the two cores may depart considerably from unity although the reactor shows a single stable period. It is shown that the reactivity change which a rod in one core must introduce to restore criticality after a change is made in the other core is generally not equal in magnitude to that of the change which it compensates. Flux ratio as well as period must be known to determine the excess reactivities; conventional rod calibration data must be corrected for a progressive shift in flux ratio as reactivity is traded between rods. The rod drop method is discussed with two examples; a single relation does not suffice to describe the rod drop procedure. The single transfer function of a simple reactor system is replaced by a set of six transfer functions for the two-core system, two of which are derived for illustration. Even though an oscillator may be located midway between them, the amplitudes and phases of flux in the two cores will not agree except in the special situation of identical cores and equal flux levels. This complicates the problem of regulation.