ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
August 2026
Nuclear Technology
July 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
The deadline arrives: Checking in on the Reactor Pilot Program
On May 23, 2025, President Trump signed Executive Order 14301, “Reforming Nuclear Reactor Testing at the DOE,” which instructed the Department of Energy to create a Reactor Pilot Program (RPP)—a new system in which companies could pursue DOE authorization to build and test their first-of-a-kind nuclear technologies. EO 14301 set an ambitious goal for that program: three reactors achieving criticality by July 4, 2026.
G. T. Yeh, T. Tamura
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 82 | Number 2 | October 1982 | Pages 206-219
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE82-A28702
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Geohydrochemical factors that affect the transport of low-level wastes in saturated-unsaturated porous media are described. Depending on the availability of those geohydrochemical parameters and the detail of information desired, three levels of analyses can be undertaken. Two examples used to illustrate these three levels of analyses are the seepage pond problem and the shallow trench burial problem. The former example indicates that the lower level of resolution gives the more conservative estimate of the breakthrough time for the contaminant. The latter example exemplifies the cases that simple levels of resolution are not adequate nor possible because the flow variables and parameters cannot be determined with rational assumptions. The level 1 model can best be used for screening purposes while level 2 analysis can be employed to rank the alternative sites. Level 3 models should be used for detailed studies of the impact of the chosen site or for predictive assessment of operational sites and decomission scenarios.