ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Apr 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
June 2026
Nuclear Technology
March 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
DOE selects first companies for nuclear launch pad
The Department of Energy’s Office of Nuclear Energy and the National Reactor Innovation Center have announced their first selections for the Nuclear Energy Launch Pad: three companies developing microreactors and one developing fuel supply.
The four companies—Deployable Energy, General Matter, NuCube Energy, and Radiant Industries—were selected from the initial pool of Reactor Pilot Program and Fuel Line Pilot Program applicants, the two precursor programs to the launch pad.
Ehsan U. Khan
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 61 | Number 1 | September 1976 | Pages 112-115
Technical Note | doi.org/10.13182/NSE76-A28467
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The relative importance of energy redistribution by thermal conduction and sweep flow mixing in a wire-wrapped fuel assembly are quantitatively described at various Reynolds numbers. For a given bundle geometry, a critical Reynolds number exists below which thermal conduction appears to govern the temperature distribution within the bundle. As the thermal conduction effects become progressively important at low Reynolds numbers, the transverse temperature gradient in the bundle decreases. This result would have an important effect on incoherency in assembly voiding. If one were to develop a model of a full-size liquid-metal fast breeder reactor bundle to study incoherency in voiding, an important parameter is the maximum temperature difference at the bundle exit. Whereas this parameter is the same for a 19- and 217-pin bundle at design operating conditions, it is significantly different at low Reynolds numbers. This low Reynolds number bundle-size effect was determined by analysis of steady-state data and is valid for very slow transients where the thermal inertia of the structure is unimportant. Inclusion of the structure thermal inertia would tend to diminish this bundle-size effect.