ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
July 2026
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
Breaking ground on a new approach to construction
The drive to Kairos Power’s reactor demonstration site in Oak Ridge, Tenn., is not only scenic—it’s historic. Nearly 85 years ago, roughly 30,000 construction workers transformed orchards and farmland into a key Manhattan Project site. Depending on your route, you may pass by one of the three gatehouses that were once military checkpoints controlling access to Atomic Energy Commission production facilities.
D. C. Leslie, J. G. Hill
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 26 | Number 2 | October 1966 | Pages 222-229
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE66-A28164
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
In resonance capture calculations, it is usual to assume that the capture in any one resonance is unaffected by the existence of other resonances: this is known as the “flux recovery” assumption. This assumption is exact for hydrogenous moderation in a homogeneous situation. However, in highly heterogeneous lattice cells such as that of the Steam Generating Heavy Water Reactor (SGHW), in which the fuel is intimately associated with a powerful moderator, the resonance flux in the fuel is depressed below that in the bulk moderator. In this paper, this flux depression effect is investigated by using a model in which all moderation is hydrogenous and the resonances are square. This model suggests that the flux recovery assumption will overestimate 238U capture in a typical SGHW Lattice by about 5%.