ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
August 2026
Nuclear Technology
July 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
The deadline arrives: Checking in on the Reactor Pilot Program
On May 23, 2025, President Trump signed Executive Order 14301, “Reforming Nuclear Reactor Testing at the DOE,” which instructed the Department of Energy to create a Reactor Pilot Program (RPP)—a new system in which companies could pursue DOE authorization to build and test their first-of-a-kind nuclear technologies. EO 14301 set an ambitious goal for that program: three reactors achieving criticality by July 4, 2026.
L. G. Haggmark, T. H. Jones, N. E. Scofield, W. J. Gurney
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 23 | Number 2 | October 1965 | Pages 138-149
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE65-A28138
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The angular distribution of backscattered dose-rate ratio was measured for ‘semi-infinite’ concrete, aluminum and steel slabs irradiated by plane-parallel beams of Co60 and Cs137 gamma photons. The photons were incident on the slabs at angles, measured from the normal to the slab, of arccos 1.00, 0.75 and 0.50. For the necessary sensitivity, the backscattered dose rate was measured by a digital dosimetry system using a plastic scintillator as the detector. An empirical formula for differential dose-rate ratio was derived from the experimental data. Comparisons are made with two other experiments and a semi-empirical formula fitted to a Monte Carlo calculation. The experiments generally agree to within 20%. The values based upon the Monte Carlo calculation are generally 20% to 35% lower than the experimental values.