ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
July 2026
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
Breaking ground on a new approach to construction
The drive to Kairos Power’s reactor demonstration site in Oak Ridge, Tenn., is not only scenic—it’s historic. Nearly 85 years ago, roughly 30,000 construction workers transformed orchards and farmland into a key Manhattan Project site. Depending on your route, you may pass by one of the three gatehouses that were once military checkpoints controlling access to Atomic Energy Commission production facilities.
L. G. Haggmark, T. H. Jones, N. E. Scofield, W. J. Gurney
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 23 | Number 2 | October 1965 | Pages 138-149
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE65-A28138
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The angular distribution of backscattered dose-rate ratio was measured for ‘semi-infinite’ concrete, aluminum and steel slabs irradiated by plane-parallel beams of Co60 and Cs137 gamma photons. The photons were incident on the slabs at angles, measured from the normal to the slab, of arccos 1.00, 0.75 and 0.50. For the necessary sensitivity, the backscattered dose rate was measured by a digital dosimetry system using a plastic scintillator as the detector. An empirical formula for differential dose-rate ratio was derived from the experimental data. Comparisons are made with two other experiments and a semi-empirical formula fitted to a Monte Carlo calculation. The experiments generally agree to within 20%. The values based upon the Monte Carlo calculation are generally 20% to 35% lower than the experimental values.