ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Dec 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
December 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
November 2025
Latest News
3D-printed tool at SRS makes quicker work of tank waste sampling
A 3D-printed tool has been developed at the Department of Energy’s Savannah River Site in South Carolina that can eliminate months from the job of radioactive tank waste sampling.
L. G. Haggmark, T. H. Jones, N. E. Scofield, W. J. Gurney
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 23 | Number 2 | October 1965 | Pages 138-149
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE65-A28138
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The angular distribution of backscattered dose-rate ratio was measured for ‘semi-infinite’ concrete, aluminum and steel slabs irradiated by plane-parallel beams of Co60 and Cs137 gamma photons. The photons were incident on the slabs at angles, measured from the normal to the slab, of arccos 1.00, 0.75 and 0.50. For the necessary sensitivity, the backscattered dose rate was measured by a digital dosimetry system using a plastic scintillator as the detector. An empirical formula for differential dose-rate ratio was derived from the experimental data. Comparisons are made with two other experiments and a semi-empirical formula fitted to a Monte Carlo calculation. The experiments generally agree to within 20%. The values based upon the Monte Carlo calculation are generally 20% to 35% lower than the experimental values.