ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
July 2026
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
Breaking ground on a new approach to construction
The drive to Kairos Power’s reactor demonstration site in Oak Ridge, Tenn., is not only scenic—it’s historic. Nearly 85 years ago, roughly 30,000 construction workers transformed orchards and farmland into a key Manhattan Project site. Depending on your route, you may pass by one of the three gatehouses that were once military checkpoints controlling access to Atomic Energy Commission production facilities.
M. M. Meier, D. A. Clark, C. A. Goulding, J. B. McClelland, G. L. Morgan, C. E. Moss, W. B. Amian
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 102 | Number 3 | July 1989 | Pages 310-321
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE89-A27480
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Differential (p,xn) cross sections, d2σ/dΩ dEn, from thin targets and absolute neutron yields from stopping-length targets at angles of 7.5, 30, 60, and 150 deg for the 113-MeV proton bombardment of elemental beryllium, carbon, aluminum, iron, and depleted uranium are measured. Additional cross-section measurements are reported for oxygen, tungsten, and lead. Time-of-flight techniques are used to identify and discriminate against backgrounds and to determine the neutron energy spectrum. Comparisons of the experimental data with intranuclear-cascade evaporation model calculations with the HETC code show discrepancies as high as a factor of 7 in the differential cross sections. These discrepancies make it possible to identify some of the good agreement seen in the stopping-length yield comparison as fortuitous cancellation of incorrect production estimates in different energy regimes.