ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
May 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
June 2026
Nuclear Technology
April 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Nuclear Energy Strategy announced at CNA2026
At the Canadian Nuclear Association Conference (CNA2026) in Ottawa, Ontario, on April 29, Minister of Energy and Natural Resources Tim Hodgson announced that Natural Resources Canada (NRCan) is developing a new Nuclear Energy Strategy for the country. The strategy, which is slated to be released by the end of this year, will be based on four objectives: 1) enabling new nuclear builds across Canada, 2) being a global supplier and exporter of nuclear technology and services, 3) expanding uranium production and nuclear fuel opportunities, and 4) developing new Canadian nuclear innovations, including in both fission and fusion technologies.
Bertram Wolfe, David Fischer
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 5 | Number 1 | January 1959 | Pages 5-10
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE59-A27321
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The perturbation approach to control element evaluation is extended from the work presented in a previous paper. A two-group second-order perturbation expression for control element worth is obtained. This has, as its starting point, the unperturbed fast flux but considers the depression in the thermal flux caused by the control element and then, in turn, considers the perturbation on the fast flux caused by the perturbed thermal flux. Finally, the effect of the perturbed fast flux on the thermal flux is evaluated. It is shown that this process, if continued, converges to the correct answer. The perturbation results are compared to experiments for the case of a weak rod in the reflector region of the Bulk Shielding Reactor. The perturbation results are also compared to exact two-group calculations for a cylindrical rod on the axis of a bare cylindrical reactor. In both cases, excellent agreement is obtained.