ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 15–18, 2026
Phoenix, AZ|Arizona Grand Resort & Spa
Latest Magazine Issues
Sep 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2026
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Westinghouse, Nordion, and PSEG team up to produce Co‑60 in the United States
This past January, Westinghouse Electric Company, Nordion, and PSEG Nuclear formalized agreements to implement newly developed cobalt-60 production technology at Units 1 and 2 of PSEG’s Salem nuclear power plant in New Jersey, with the Co-60 to be supplied to Nordion. Through an ongoing joint initiative, the companies aim to harness U.S. pressurized water reactors to produce a key medical isotope and build the first commercial-scale Co-60 production platform in the United States.
Katsuhei Kobayashi, Yoshiaki Fujita, Tohru Oosaki, Robert C. Block
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 65 | Number 2 | February 1978 | Pages 347-353
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE78-A27162
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The neutron average total cross section of thorium has been measured near 24 keV in an accurate transmission experiment using the time-of-flight method and the iron-filtered-beam technique. The measured average total cross section is 14.933 ± 0.041 b. The computer codes BABEL and MCROSS were used to stochastically calculate average cross sections near 24 keV from several sets of resonance parameters. The average total cross section calculated from the Forman et al. data set is in good agreement with the experimental results, but the cross section calculated from the ENDF/B-IV data set is 16% lower than the measured value. The major part of this 16% discrepancy is attributed to too small a nuclear scattering radius in the ENDF/B-IV data set.