ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2026
Nuclear Technology
August 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
In transition: Commercializing fusion power
Commercial fusion power is closer than ever. There are now around 30 U.S. fusion companies, several of which claim to be on track to connect to the grid as early as the 2030s.
Tokamak and laser inertial confinement approaches benefit from decades of research at facilities such as the National Ignition Facility (NIF) at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and ITER, with alternative concepts including stellarator, magnetic mirror, and Z-pinch confinement also making notable progress as private and government funding for fusion increases.
Katsuhei Kobayashi, Yoshiaki Fujita, Tohru Oosaki, Robert C. Block
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 65 | Number 2 | February 1978 | Pages 347-353
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE78-A27162
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The neutron average total cross section of thorium has been measured near 24 keV in an accurate transmission experiment using the time-of-flight method and the iron-filtered-beam technique. The measured average total cross section is 14.933 ± 0.041 b. The computer codes BABEL and MCROSS were used to stochastically calculate average cross sections near 24 keV from several sets of resonance parameters. The average total cross section calculated from the Forman et al. data set is in good agreement with the experimental results, but the cross section calculated from the ENDF/B-IV data set is 16% lower than the measured value. The major part of this 16% discrepancy is attributed to too small a nuclear scattering radius in the ENDF/B-IV data set.