ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
July 2026
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
Breaking ground on a new approach to construction
The drive to Kairos Power’s reactor demonstration site in Oak Ridge, Tenn., is not only scenic—it’s historic. Nearly 85 years ago, roughly 30,000 construction workers transformed orchards and farmland into a key Manhattan Project site. Depending on your route, you may pass by one of the three gatehouses that were once military checkpoints controlling access to Atomic Energy Commission production facilities.
Michael R. Prisco, Robert E. Henry, Michael N. Hutcherson, John L. Linehan
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 63 | Number 4 | August 1977 | Pages 365-375
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE77-A27054
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Two-phase, critical flow data are reported for initially saturated and subcooled liquid Freon-11 flowing through sharp-edged entrance tubes for length-to-diameter (L/D) ratios from 2.82 to 100. Comparisons among various analytical models and these data show that nonequilibrium models describe the critical flow phenomenon more accurately than equilibrium models. It is shown that to obtain reliable exit plane pressure measurements, it is necessary to have a gradual divergence at the exit of the constant-area tube. This minimizes the expansion of the exiting fluid, which would otherwise result in an exit pressure measurement much lower than the one-dimensional value governing the flow. Utilizing data from this study, quantitative estimates of the individual phase velocities at the condition of critical flow indicate that “vapor choking” is not the mechanism by which two-phase critical flow occurs in this investigation. The flow pattern in a transparent test section, with an L/D ratio of 2.82, has been observed and photographed, and this shows that the separated flow condition (liquid jet surrounded by vapor) begins to break up into a dispersed two-phase mixture approximately one equivalent diameter downstream of the entrance.