ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2026
Nuclear Technology
August 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
In transition: Commercializing fusion power
Commercial fusion power is closer than ever. There are now around 30 U.S. fusion companies, several of which claim to be on track to connect to the grid as early as the 2030s.
Tokamak and laser inertial confinement approaches benefit from decades of research at facilities such as the National Ignition Facility (NIF) at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and ITER, with alternative concepts including stellarator, magnetic mirror, and Z-pinch confinement also making notable progress as private and government funding for fusion increases.
R. D. McKnight
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 62 | Number 2 | February 1977 | Pages 309-330
Technical Note | doi.org/10.13182/NSE77-A26967
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A series of benchmark calculations of critical experiments has been performed to assess the effects that recent changes in the ENDF/B data files have had on calculated liquid-metal fast breeder reactor parameters. Three well-documented critical assemblies were studied using standard methods of fast reactor analysis (two-dimensional multigroup diffusion theory) with both ENDF/B-III and -IV. A review of the changes in the principal cross sections incorporated in the latest evaluation has been made and was used to interpret the changes in calculated integral parameters. Some of the principal cross-section modifications included in ENDF/B-IV were: decreasing (≈2%), src ="fig002.gif" alt=""/> (≈1 to 1.5%), and src ="fig003.gif" alt=""/> (≈3 to 4%) and increasing src ="fig004.gif" alt=""/> (≈1 to 1.5%). In general, improved agreement between measured and calculated integral parameters has been obtained with the new ENDF/B evaluation. The overprediction of 28c/49 ƒ is reduced slightly (≈1.5%); the central worth calculation-to-experiment discrepancy is generally reduced (≈5 to 15%); and little change occurs in the calculated eigenvalues that remain ≈1.0 to 1.5% δk low.