ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Apr 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
June 2026
Nuclear Technology
March 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
DOE selects first companies for nuclear launch pad
The Department of Energy’s Office of Nuclear Energy and the National Reactor Innovation Center have announced their first selections for the Nuclear Energy Launch Pad: three companies developing microreactors and one developing fuel supply.
The four companies—Deployable Energy, General Matter, NuCube Energy, and Radiant Industries—were selected from the initial pool of Reactor Pilot Program and Fuel Line Pilot Program applicants, the two precursor programs to the launch pad.
R. D. McKnight
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 62 | Number 2 | February 1977 | Pages 309-330
Technical Note | doi.org/10.13182/NSE77-A26967
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A series of benchmark calculations of critical experiments has been performed to assess the effects that recent changes in the ENDF/B data files have had on calculated liquid-metal fast breeder reactor parameters. Three well-documented critical assemblies were studied using standard methods of fast reactor analysis (two-dimensional multigroup diffusion theory) with both ENDF/B-III and -IV. A review of the changes in the principal cross sections incorporated in the latest evaluation has been made and was used to interpret the changes in calculated integral parameters. Some of the principal cross-section modifications included in ENDF/B-IV were: decreasing (≈2%), src ="fig002.gif" alt=""/> (≈1 to 1.5%), and src ="fig003.gif" alt=""/> (≈3 to 4%) and increasing src ="fig004.gif" alt=""/> (≈1 to 1.5%). In general, improved agreement between measured and calculated integral parameters has been obtained with the new ENDF/B evaluation. The overprediction of 28c/49 ƒ is reduced slightly (≈1.5%); the central worth calculation-to-experiment discrepancy is generally reduced (≈5 to 15%); and little change occurs in the calculated eigenvalues that remain ≈1.0 to 1.5% δk low.