ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
July 2026
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
Breaking ground on a new approach to construction
The drive to Kairos Power’s reactor demonstration site in Oak Ridge, Tenn., is not only scenic—it’s historic. Nearly 85 years ago, roughly 30,000 construction workers transformed orchards and farmland into a key Manhattan Project site. Depending on your route, you may pass by one of the three gatehouses that were once military checkpoints controlling access to Atomic Energy Commission production facilities.
S. R. Bierman, E. D. Clayton
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 61 | Number 3 | November 1976 | Pages 370-376
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE76-A26923
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The results from a series of criticality experiments with three different mixtures of oxides of plutonium and uranium are presented. The fuel mixtures consisted of 235U-depleted uranium homogenized with ∼8, 15, and 30 wt% plutonium and blended, homogeneously, with polystyrene to achieve H:(Pu + U) atomic ratios of ∼7, 3, and 3, respectively. Critical sizes are given for rectangular parallelepipeds of each of the fuels fully reflected with a methacrylate plastic (Plexiglas). Critical sizes are also given for unreflected parallelepipeds of the 30-wt% plutonium-enriched fuel mixture. For the 30-wt% plutonium-enriched mixture, sufficient fuel was available to permit determining that the critical thickness of a fully reflected slab of this material, infinite in two dimensions, was 12.93 + 0.14 cm. Comparisons were made between the critical assemblies and calculational results using ENDF/B-III cross sections and the KENO and DTF-IV computer codes. Wherever comparisons could be made, the DTF-IV and KENO results were within 1% of each other; however, some of the comparisons between calculations and experiments differed by 2 to 3% in keff.