ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Apr 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
June 2026
Nuclear Technology
March 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
DOE selects first companies for nuclear launch pad
The Department of Energy’s Office of Nuclear Energy and the National Reactor Innovation Center have announced their first selections for the Nuclear Energy Launch Pad: three companies developing microreactors and one developing fuel supply.
The four companies—Deployable Energy, General Matter, NuCube Energy, and Radiant Industries—were selected from the initial pool of Reactor Pilot Program and Fuel Line Pilot Program applicants, the two precursor programs to the launch pad.
Walter Meyer, J. W. Leighty, J. W. Thiesing, D. H. Timmons
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 60 | Number 4 | August 1976 | Pages 405-420
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE76-A26902
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Albedos were experimentally determined for a spectrum of fast fission neutrons incident on a 24- × 24- × 9-in. concrete slab and a 24- × 24- × 6-in. cold-rolled steel slab. The experimental dose albedos were compared with those from Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) 05R Monte Carlo calculations and with orders-of-scattering calculations performed using readily available multigroup cross sections. The source of fast neutrons for the experimental studies was the Kansas State University Triga Mark II reactor; the direct and reflected neutron spectra were detected using a 2- × 2-in. liquid-scintillation spectrometer system. A computer code has been developed to normalize the experimental reflected spectra to a reference direct neutron beam measurement, to calculate the experimental dose albedos, and to evaluate the Monte Carlo dose albedos in terms of the experimental conditions. A comparison of the Monte Carlo and experimental results showed similar trends and structure, but the experimental dose albedos were smaller than the calculated ones by an average of 70 to 80%. The large energy bin widths and inaccuracies in the cross sections (errors up to 65%) used in the Monte Carlo calculations have contributed to the differences between the calculated and experimental results. Orders-of-scattering calculations for steel were performed using the ORNL DLC-2B 99-group cross-section set and similar calculations were performed for concrete using the DLC-9/FARS group cross-section set. In general, the orders-of-scattering calculated reflected spectra compare well with the experimental fast-neutron reflection spectra. Discrepancies arise in the orders-of-scattering calculated results at particular energies and scattering angles due to deficiencies identified in the multigroup compilations.