ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2026
Nuclear Technology
August 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
In transition: Commercializing fusion power
Commercial fusion power is closer than ever. There are now around 30 U.S. fusion companies, several of which claim to be on track to connect to the grid as early as the 2030s.
Tokamak and laser inertial confinement approaches benefit from decades of research at facilities such as the National Ignition Facility (NIF) at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and ITER, with alternative concepts including stellarator, magnetic mirror, and Z-pinch confinement also making notable progress as private and government funding for fusion increases.
U. C. Bergmann, P. Grimm, F. Jatuff, M. F. Murphy, R. Chawla
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 156 | Number 1 | May 2007 | Pages 86-95
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE07-A2687
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The reaction-rate ratio C8/Ftot, neutron captures in 238U to total fissions, has been measured in 80 out of 96 fuel rods of a Westinghouse SVEA-96+ boiling water reactor fuel assembly. High-resolution gamma spectroscopy was performed on individual fuel rods, withdrawn from the SVEA-96+ assembly after irradiation at low power in the center of the LWR-PROTEUS reactor core. Absolute experimental errors of 1.7% and relative errors of 0.6% (for rod-to-rod ratios) were achieved. The experimental results were used as a database for validation of four different calculational tools: CASMO-4 and HELIOS as commercial assembly codes, the Paul Scherrer Institute in-house code BOXER, and the Monte Carlo transport code MCNPX. In general, on the level of a few percent, there is good agreement between experiment and calculations, the use of a recently proposed 239Np gamma-ray emission probability improving even further the agreement. However, the highly heterogeneous design of the SVEA-96+ assembly (both in terms of material compositions and neutron moderation conditions) causes some problems. Clear deviations from assembly mean values are found among the burnable absorber fuel rods that are grouped in clusters (direct neighbors), a unique feature of this assembly design. For these rods the codes overpredict C8/Ftot by several percent, including MCNPX. Additional trends, not present in the results from the Monte Carlo calculation which generally shows the best overall agreement with experiment, are identified for the deterministic codes.