ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 15–18, 2026
Phoenix, AZ|Arizona Grand Resort & Spa
Latest Magazine Issues
Sep 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2026
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Westinghouse, Nordion, and PSEG team up to produce Co‑60 in the United States
This past January, Westinghouse Electric Company, Nordion, and PSEG Nuclear formalized agreements to implement newly developed cobalt-60 production technology at Units 1 and 2 of PSEG’s Salem nuclear power plant in New Jersey, with the Co-60 to be supplied to Nordion. Through an ongoing joint initiative, the companies aim to harness U.S. pressurized water reactors to produce a key medical isotope and build the first commercial-scale Co-60 production platform in the United States.
H. L. Dodds, Jr.
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 59 | Number 3 | March 1976 | Pages 271-276
Technical Note | doi.org/10.13182/NSE76-A26825
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The quasistatic method was compared with a direct finite difference method of solving two-dimensional thermal reactor transient problems with thermal-hydraulic feedback. Calculations using both methods were performed for a cylindrical (r-z), D2O-moderated and -cooled uranium-fueled reactor. This study shows that the quasistatic method is capable of producing highly accurate results, relative to the direct finite difference method, for two-dimensional thermal reactor transients with feedback. The quasistatic method also offers the flexibility of using larger time steps between flux shape calculations, without encountering numerical problems, than the direct method. The quasistatic and direct method codes used in this work are comparable with respect to accuracy and computing costs for the subprompt critical transients considered in this work except for transients with weak spatial effects. For such transients, much larger time steps can be used in the quasistatic code than in the direct method code to achieve a specified accuracy, which, in turn, provides a considerable savings in computing costs.