ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
April 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Going Nuclear: Notes from the officially unofficial book tour
I work in the analytical labs at one of Europe’s oldest and largest nuclear sites: Sellafield, in northwestern England. I spend my days at the fume hood front, pipette in one hand and radiation probe in the other (and dosimeter pinned to my chest, of course). Outside the lab, I have a second job: I moonlight as a writer and public speaker. My new popular science book—Going Nuclear: How the Atom Will Save the World—came out last summer, and it feels like my life has been running at full power ever since.
H. L. Dodds, Jr.
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 59 | Number 3 | March 1976 | Pages 271-276
Technical Note | doi.org/10.13182/NSE76-A26825
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The quasistatic method was compared with a direct finite difference method of solving two-dimensional thermal reactor transient problems with thermal-hydraulic feedback. Calculations using both methods were performed for a cylindrical (r-z), D2O-moderated and -cooled uranium-fueled reactor. This study shows that the quasistatic method is capable of producing highly accurate results, relative to the direct finite difference method, for two-dimensional thermal reactor transients with feedback. The quasistatic method also offers the flexibility of using larger time steps between flux shape calculations, without encountering numerical problems, than the direct method. The quasistatic and direct method codes used in this work are comparable with respect to accuracy and computing costs for the subprompt critical transients considered in this work except for transients with weak spatial effects. For such transients, much larger time steps can be used in the quasistatic code than in the direct method code to achieve a specified accuracy, which, in turn, provides a considerable savings in computing costs.