ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
September 8–11, 2025
Atlanta, GA|Atlanta Marriott Marquis
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2025
Latest News
New coolants, new fuels: A new generation of university reactors
Here’s an easy way to make aging U.S. power reactors look relatively youthful: Compare them (average age: 43) with the nation’s university research reactors. The 25 operating today have been licensed for an average of about 58 years.
H. L. Dodds, Jr.
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 59 | Number 3 | March 1976 | Pages 271-276
Technical Note | doi.org/10.13182/NSE76-A26825
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The quasistatic method was compared with a direct finite difference method of solving two-dimensional thermal reactor transient problems with thermal-hydraulic feedback. Calculations using both methods were performed for a cylindrical (r-z), D2O-moderated and -cooled uranium-fueled reactor. This study shows that the quasistatic method is capable of producing highly accurate results, relative to the direct finite difference method, for two-dimensional thermal reactor transients with feedback. The quasistatic method also offers the flexibility of using larger time steps between flux shape calculations, without encountering numerical problems, than the direct method. The quasistatic and direct method codes used in this work are comparable with respect to accuracy and computing costs for the subprompt critical transients considered in this work except for transients with weak spatial effects. For such transients, much larger time steps can be used in the quasistatic code than in the direct method code to achieve a specified accuracy, which, in turn, provides a considerable savings in computing costs.