ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 15–18, 2026
Phoenix, AZ|Arizona Grand Resort & Spa
Latest Magazine Issues
Sep 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2026
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Westinghouse, Nordion, and PSEG team up to produce Co‑60 in the United States
This past January, Westinghouse Electric Company, Nordion, and PSEG Nuclear formalized agreements to implement newly developed cobalt-60 production technology at Units 1 and 2 of PSEG’s Salem nuclear power plant in New Jersey, with the Co-60 to be supplied to Nordion. Through an ongoing joint initiative, the companies aim to harness U.S. pressurized water reactors to produce a key medical isotope and build the first commercial-scale Co-60 production platform in the United States.
K. D. Kirby, R. A. Karam
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 59 | Number 3 | March 1976 | Pages 215-230
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE76-A26820
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Effective resonance cross sections used in the analysis of heterogeneous reactors have generally been obtained through the use of equivalence theory and/or integral transport theory. One fundamentally restrictive assumption common to equivalence theory and most integral transport methods is the flat-source approximation. The assessment of this approximation was recently completed and comprised the following: 1. comparison of the broad-group cross sections of 238U in the resolved resonance region using. a. the flat-source approximation b. the exact source distribution c. the rational approximation with a Levine-type factor 2. comparisons in (1) for three types of reactors. a. typical zero power reactor (ZPR) assembly b. liquid-metal fast breeder reactor commercial power station c. light-water power reactor. The main conclusion was that even though there were significant differences between the exactly calculated escape probabilities and those calculated with the flat-source approximation, additional differences between the general energy-dependent reciprocity and the energy-independent (but often erroneously applied as energy-dependent) reciprocity relation almost completely compensated for the error in the flat-source escape probabilities. Due to this unusual and somewhat unexpected compensating effect, the effective capture cross sections of 238U in the resolved resonance region, generated by the three methods stated above, were essentially the same.