ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
April 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Going Nuclear: Notes from the officially unofficial book tour
I work in the analytical labs at one of Europe’s oldest and largest nuclear sites: Sellafield, in northwestern England. I spend my days at the fume hood front, pipette in one hand and radiation probe in the other (and dosimeter pinned to my chest, of course). Outside the lab, I have a second job: I moonlight as a writer and public speaker. My new popular science book—Going Nuclear: How the Atom Will Save the World—came out last summer, and it feels like my life has been running at full power ever since.
R. Paviotti Corcuera
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 58 | Number 3 | November 1975 | Pages 278-290
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE75-A26777
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Systematic discrepancies between experimental and calculated neutron spectra in different fast-neutron media with high 238U content were observed, allowing the uncertainties in certain 238U neutron cross sections to be considered as the source of such discrepancies. Sensitivity studies, as well as the effect of the former uncertainties on such fast-neutron spectra showed that 238U (n, n′) inelastic scattering is by far the main parameter determining the spectrum over a large energy range. Uranium-238 (n, γ) neutron capture is important only at low energies, below the 238U (n, n′) threshold. The (n,γn′) reaction in 238U using Fricke's data leads to an increase in the discrepancies in neutron spectra though this cross section could be considered negligible according to other arguments. A general least-squares adjustment of the 238U total inelastic cross sections, on the neutron spectrum discrepancies, was carried out between 70 keV and 3.6 MeV, using two different inelastic probability matrices (those of ENDF/B-III and UKNDL-DFN 401), which were chosen among several evaluations of this reaction. The adjusted cross sections obtained in an energy mesh corresponding to lethargy intervals of 0.5 imply a systematic reduction of 20 to 30% relative to the initial values in both files, but they appear to be in good agreement with other recent (coarse-mesh) adjusted data, including the KFK-INR set.