ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 15–18, 2026
Phoenix, AZ|Arizona Grand Resort & Spa
Latest Magazine Issues
Sep 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2026
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Westinghouse, Nordion, and PSEG team up to produce Co‑60 in the United States
This past January, Westinghouse Electric Company, Nordion, and PSEG Nuclear formalized agreements to implement newly developed cobalt-60 production technology at Units 1 and 2 of PSEG’s Salem nuclear power plant in New Jersey, with the Co-60 to be supplied to Nordion. Through an ongoing joint initiative, the companies aim to harness U.S. pressurized water reactors to produce a key medical isotope and build the first commercial-scale Co-60 production platform in the United States.
M. A. Abdou, C. W. Maynard
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 56 | Number 4 | April 1975 | Pages 381-398
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE75-A26684
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The calculational methods developed for nuclear heating in an earlier paper are applied to fusion-reactor blankets and shields. The study shows that the nuclear heating in fusion-reactor blankets has been previously overestimated and is limited to ≈16 MeV per DT neutron in the absence of beryllium or fissionable materials. Methods are also examined for increasing the energy multiplication in the blanket by maximizing the rates of exothermic reactions. A general study of the sensitivity of the neutron energy deposition to changes in basic nuclear data is carried out: this study shows the following: 1. The (n, charged particles) reactions, in general, contribute ≈30 to 50% to the neutron heating in typical fusion-reactor spectra. The data for these reactions, however, are not well known and in some cases are absent from the literature. 2. Approximating the neutron heating due to the (n, n′, charged particles) reactions by that from the (n, n′) part only, amounts to ignoring 80 to 90% of the heating. 3. For reference fusion-reactor spectra, a change in the average secondary neutron energy, n′ l, of the 7Li(n, n′α)t reaction results in a relative change in the neutron heating in 7Li which is approximately one-third of that in n′, l. 4. The relative change in the neutron heating by elastic scattering due to a change in the angular distribution is larger than the relative change in . Ignoring the anisotropy of scattering can result in severely overestimated kerma factors. 5. The local energy deposition by radioactive decay is on the order of or less than 2% in most materials in typical spectra for controlled thermonuclear reactors.