ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
August 2026
Nuclear Technology
July 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
The deadline arrives: Checking in on the Reactor Pilot Program
On May 23, 2025, President Trump signed Executive Order 14301, “Reforming Nuclear Reactor Testing at the DOE,” which instructed the Department of Energy to create a Reactor Pilot Program (RPP)—a new system in which companies could pursue DOE authorization to build and test their first-of-a-kind nuclear technologies. EO 14301 set an ambitious goal for that program: three reactors achieving criticality by July 4, 2026.
R. S. Reynolds
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 51 | Number 2 | June 1973 | Pages 102-112
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE73-A26585
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Experiments have been performed which give further insight into the so-called “in-and-down” scattering problem. Experimental ceiling attenuation factors have been developed and compared with previously published results of radiation attenuation in basement ceilings.The experiments were performed on a full-scale structure with basement ceiling mass thicknesses of 12 and 0 psf at several solid angle fractions. Additional experiments were performed for several ceiling mass thicknesses at a solid angle fraction near unity. Generally, the experiments showed that previously published ceiling attenuation factors appear inadequate for large solid angle fractions and large overhead mass thicknesses. For small mass thicknesses and solid angle fractions below ≈0.8, the agreement between experiment and previously published results is reasonable. It is clear that ceiling attenuation factors should demonstrate a solid angle fraction dependence as well as a mass thickness dependence. However, these experiments show that there is no reason to believe that in the limit as the solid angle fraction approaches unity, the ceiling attenuation factor should approach old formulations which had no solid angle fraction dependence.It has also been shown in this work that ceiling attenuation factors may be experimentally determined solely from finite field data. There is no need to estimate far-field contributions or skyshine contributions in the determination of ceiling attenuation factors.