ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
August 2026
Nuclear Technology
July 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
The deadline arrives: Checking in on the Reactor Pilot Program
On May 23, 2025, President Trump signed Executive Order 14301, “Reforming Nuclear Reactor Testing at the DOE,” which instructed the Department of Energy to create a Reactor Pilot Program (RPP)—a new system in which companies could pursue DOE authorization to build and test their first-of-a-kind nuclear technologies. EO 14301 set an ambitious goal for that program: three reactors achieving criticality by July 4, 2026.
R. G. Sowden, B. R. Harder, K. E. Francis
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 16 | Number 1 | May 1963 | Pages 12-24
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE63-A26474
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Data obtained from studies of the electrophoretic mobility of thoria and plutonia suspensions have been examined in relation to their dispersion and ion adsorption properties. Dispersion data in many cases bear out qualitatively the concept of a critical zeta potential below which flocculation of the suspension takes place, but exceptions to the rule have been found in a number of electrolyte solutions. Adsorption isotherms obtained from tracer studies and direct analysis have been compared with those calculated from electrophoretic data. Differences between ζ and ψ in the case of hydrogen ions are qualitatively consistent with adsorption on a negative site in the presence of a Stern-type layer of anions. Observations with I−, , Cs+, Sr2+, Ce3+, and Th4+ require a qualified interpretation, and reveal the danger of drawing quantitative conclusions from electrophoretic data unsupported by more direct measurements.