ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2026
Nuclear Technology
August 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
In transition: Commercializing fusion power
Commercial fusion power is closer than ever. There are now around 30 U.S. fusion companies, several of which claim to be on track to connect to the grid as early as the 2030s.
Tokamak and laser inertial confinement approaches benefit from decades of research at facilities such as the National Ignition Facility (NIF) at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and ITER, with alternative concepts including stellarator, magnetic mirror, and Z-pinch confinement also making notable progress as private and government funding for fusion increases.
K. Macku, F. Jatuff, M. Murphy, M. Plaschy, P. Grimm, O. P. Joneja, R. Chawla
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 155 | Number 1 | January 2007 | Pages 96-101
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE07-A2647
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
In the context of the LWR-PROTEUS program, radial and azimuthal 235U fission (F5) and 238U capture (C8) rate distributions have been calculated for zero-burnup pins of a Westinghouse SVEA-96 Optima2 boiling water reactor fuel assembly using the stochastic MCNP4C and the deterministic CASMO-4 codes. The within-pin F5 distributions predicted by the two codes are in very good agreement; the C8 distributions are more pronounced, and there are significant discrepancies between the codes, both azimuthally and radially. The calculations have been compared with experimental results obtained from activation foil measurements in two pins of the assembly irradiated in the center of the PROTEUS test zone. The measurements confirm that the two codes can accurately predict the radial and azimuthal F5 distributions but that MCNP4C within-pin C8 distributions are much more accurate than those of CASMO-4.
